The first step toward living is understanding it's purpose.

Thursday, July 09, 2009
Wikidpedia
I do not like Wikipedia, it's information in many cases is extremely bias and inaccurate, they are unwilling to promote facts yet unfortunatly, they are seen as the most authoritive figure in inter-fact.

If you don't believe me, google for things like "wikipedia inaccuracies", "wikipedia biased", "wikipedia inaccurate" or any other likely keywords and wake up!

Just who is editing and managing wiki articles?

"if Wikipedia is "history", then history is indeed bunk" - Petronella Wayte.

Rather than Wikidpedia, I rather this cool site which seems to promote a more accurate version of current information and historical record based on fact. Better job.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page

Labels:

 
posted by c0ntex at 11:10 AM | Permalink |


2 Comments:


At 5:32 PM, Anonymous Abdullah

man!!! I use wikipedia almost daily and every now and then

so what should people like me do

 

At 9:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous

Hi bro, I think for normal stuff it is ok. My problem is with more political issues, rather than 'who invented the telephone' :)

It took me a long time to get Islamic Terrorism removed from the main Terrorism page and replaced with a less specific 'Religious Terrorism'. After numerous attempts top change it, and several 'discussions', they decided to allow my edits to stay.

If you look at the other sections relating to terrorism and Islam in general, there is nothing but a bias opinion, which is not very good for an encyclopedia.

According to Wikipedia, Islamic terrorists did 9/11 and 7/7 bombings. Where is their proof? Quoting one of the authors, it is "well meaning systemic bias". In other words, none.

 
Post a Comment

« back home